首页> 外文OA文献 >Exploratory and confirmatory factorial structure of the MCMI-III Personality Disorders: Overlapping versus non-overlapping scales
【2h】

Exploratory and confirmatory factorial structure of the MCMI-III Personality Disorders: Overlapping versus non-overlapping scales

机译:探索性和确认性的MCMI-III人格障碍结构:重叠量表与非重叠量表

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of this study was to explore the factorial structure of the 14 Personality Disorder (PD’s) scales of the MCMI-III for the overlapping and non-overlapping scales, independently. Previous exploratory studies using different factor extraction procedures inform that the structure of MCMI-III personality disorders has between 2 and 4 factors. The present study used a large sample of 674 non-clinical subjects divided at random in two groups: a) calibration, and b) validation. In the calibration group, principal component analysis with orthogonal rotation was carried out, obtaining 2, 3 and 4 factors for the overlapping and non-overlapping scales independently. In the validation group, the three models were compared using confirmatory factorial analysis techniques. The exploratory and confirmatory results indicate that the 4-factor solution is the most plausible. Although the congruence coefficients between non-overlapping and overlapping scales in the 4-factor solution were higher, confirmatory factor analysis showed that models designed from overlapping scales did not fit well to data.
机译:这项研究的目的是针对重叠和非重叠量表分别探索MCMI-III的14种人格障碍(PD)量表的阶乘结构。先前使用不同因素提取程序进行的探索性研究表明,MCMI-III人格障碍的结构具有2至4个因素。本研究使用了674个非临床受试者的大量样本,将其随机分为两组:a)校准,b)验证。在校准组中,进行了正交旋转的主成分分析,分别获得了2个,3个和4个重叠和非重叠刻度的因子。在验证组中,使用验证性因子分析技术比较了三个模型。探索性结果和确认性结果表明,四因素解决方案最为合理。尽管在4因子解决方案中非重叠量表和重叠量表之间的一致性系数较高,但验证性因子分析表明,由重叠量表设计的模型不太适合数据。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号